Data underlying the proceeding: Are low-cost, hand-held NIR sensors suitable to detect adulterations of halal meat? (dataset)

Data underlying the proceeding: Are low-cost, hand-held NIR sensors suitable to detect adulterations of halal meat?

doi:10.4121/14671959.v2

The doi above is for this specific version of this dataset, which is currently the latest. Newer versions may be published in the future. For a link that will always point to the latest version, please use
doi: 10.4121/14671959

Datacite citation style:

Müller-Maatsch, Judith; Weesepoel, Yannick; Alewijn, Martin; Wijtten, Michiel; Roetgerink, Emma (2021): Data underlying the proceeding: Are low-cost, hand-held NIR sensors suitable to detect adulterations of halal meat?. Version 2. 4TU.ResearchData. dataset. https://doi.org/10.4121/14671959.v2

Other citation styles (APA, Harvard, MLA, Vancouver, Chicago, IEEE) available at Datacite

Dataset

choose version:

version 2 - 2021-06-02 (latest)

version 1 - 2021-05-31

usage stats

1652

views

685

downloads

categories

keywords

adulteration, animal species, halal food, minced meat, near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy, portable devices

geolocation

Wageningen, the Netherlands

time coverage

September-November 2020

licence

CC BY-SA 4.0

export as...

RefWorks, BibTeX, Reference Manager, Endnote, DataCite, NLM, DC, CFF

by Judith Müller-Maatsch

, Yannick Weesepoel , Martin Alewijn , Michiel Wijtten , Emma Roetgerink

The data was collected from frozen-thawed, minced meat samples (pork, beef, chicken, lamb and mixtures of 2-50% pork with the respective other meat) using five NIR sensors in reflection and not precessed any further. Description of the sampling procedure, processing of the samples as well as measurement settings are according to Mueller-Maatsch et al. (2021, https://doi.org/10.5445/KSP/1000128686).

history