The doi above is for this specific version of this dataset, which is currently the latest. Newer versions may be published in the future. For a link that will always point to the latest version, please use
doi: 10.4121/ec2fffe3-0bd7-4a7b-b477-74b25ad17983

Gusheva, Ema; Pfenninger, Stefan; Lilliestam, Johan (2024): Data and code related to the publication: "Past peak prominence: The changing role of integrated assessment modeling in the IPCC". Version 2. 4TU.ResearchData. dataset. https://doi.org/10.4121/ec2fffe3-0bd7-4a7b-b477-74b25ad17983.v2

Dataset

x choose version: version 1 - 2024-01-22

• Climate and Climate Change
• Environment

Epistemic Hierarchy, Integrated Assessment Modelling, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Model-policy interface, Science-policy interface, Summary for Policymakers, Working Group 3

1990-2022

CC BY 4.0

RefWorks, BibTeX, Reference Manager, Endnote, DataCite, NLM, DC, CFF

by Ema Gusheva , Stefan Pfenninger , Johan Lilliestam

We created this dataset and scripts with the research aim to analyze the influence of Integrated Assessment Modelling (IAM) research on Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change (IPCC) reports. We analyzed the following research questions (Table 1):

1.    Which IAM researchers have been cited in IPCC WG3 reports?

2.    To what extent are IPCC WG3 reports based on IAM research?

2.1. What share of IPCC WG3 references are authored by any IAM researcher individually?

2.2. How much of the evidence base of IPCC WG3 reports is IAM research?

2.2.1.    What share of IPCC WG3 references are authored by all IAM researchers together?

2.2.2.    How sensitive are the results to different sample sizes of IAM researchers?

2.3. How many IAM researchers are responsible for the majority of IAM research in IPCC reports?

2.4. What share of IPCC WG3 references in each chapter are authored by IAM researchers?

3.    To what extent are IPCC WG3 SPM statements based on IAM research?

4.    How diverse is the sample of IAM research covered in IPCC WG3 reports?

RQs that can be answered using the same dataset:

·     Who are the most cited researchers by IPCC WG3 reports? (Section 1)

·     Which chapters act as knowledge bridges in IPCC reports? Which chapters are most commonly co-cited in the SPM? Which chapters are not well covered in the SPM? (Section 3)

·     What share of evidence in IPCC WG3 reports is attributable to the top 30 most cited researchers? (Section 1 & 2.3)

·     What is the distribution of affiliated institutes for IAM researchers who have been cited in IPCC WG3 reports? (Section 4)

 

RQs that can be answered by modifying the script/files:

·     Who are the most cited researchers in other reports (e.g. UNEP reports)? (Section 1)

·     To what extent has research from another research field (e.g. nuclear energy research) been cited in IPCC WG3 reports? (Section 2.1, 2.2 & 2.4)

·     To what extent has IAM research been covered in other reports (e.g. UNEP reports)? (Section 2.1, 2.2 & 2.4)

·     How diverse is the IAM research covered in IPCC WG3 reports regarding ethnicity and academic experience level? (Section 4)

Check the documentation file for more details.

• 2024-01-22 first online

• 2024-11-08 published, posted

4TU.ResearchData

.r, .xlsx

Past peak prominence: The changing role of integrated assessment modeling in the IPCC

• European Climate and Energy Modelling Forum (grant code 101022622) [more info...] European Commission

TU Delft, Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Department of Engineering, Systems and Services