Supplementary data for the paper 'A role of peripheral vision in chess? Evidence from a gaze-contingent method'
DOI: 10.4121/21816081
Datacite citation style
Dataset
Chunking theory and previous eye-tracking studies suggest that expert chess players use peripheral vision to judge chess positions and determine the best moves to play. However, the role of peripheral vision in chess has largely been inferred rather than tested through controlled experimentation. In this study, we used a gaze-contingent paradigm in a reconstruction task, similar to the one initially used by De Groot (1946). It was hypothesized that the smaller the gaze-contingent window while memorizing a chess position, the smaller the differences in reconstruction accuracy between novice and expert players. Participants viewed 30 chess positions for 20 seconds, after which they reconstructed this position. This was done for four different window sizes as well as for full visibility of the board. The results, as measured by Cohen’s d effect sizes between experts and novices of the proportion of correctly placed pieces, supported the above hypothesis, with experts performing much better but losing much of their performance advantage for the smallest window size. A complementary find-the-best-move task and additional eye-movement analyses showed that experts had a longer median fixation duration and more spatially concentrated scan patterns than novice players. These findings suggest a key contribution of peripheral vision and are consistent with the prevailing chunking theory.
History
- 2023-01-05 first online
- 2023-01-13 published, posted
Publisher
4TU.ResearchDataFormat
.m, .mat, .mp4, .png, .txt, .xlsxOrganizations
Faculty of Mechanical, Maritime and Materials Engineering, Delft University of TechnologyDATA
Files (17)
- 2,894 bytesMD5:
31849ebfb042fab1709be17d33f8d49ereadme.txt - 814,548,046 bytesMD5:
f72aa640a37a930accee5a1baa177578alldata.mat - 213 bytesMD5:
de8639e630190bad2acbc3b5e425210dcohend.m - 1,700 bytesMD5:
81c5a45ae3d1847f15a0e958df2187fecreateHeatmaps.m - 933,149,515 bytesMD5:
6b646d7eb31b59869544de30f7459cf6demo.MOV - 20,360,782 bytesMD5:
308cfdca3e0fc598cc4824b7ec4185e1Experiment builder.zip - 7,519,863 bytesMD5:
2599ed07749340378ba5786f719b13a2Find-the-best-move pngs.zip - 31,373 bytesMD5:
9b7629857ae6ebbbf82282ea93daea77Findthebestmove.xlsx - 22,474 bytesMD5:
90ea7149b532caf64d59f6909877564cFixationFilterEyelink1000v106.m - 406,786,384 bytesMD5:
a70392712a1e2e41f46f177d664adcc2Gaze.zip - 29,908 bytesMD5:
91288761196efe65388842ca2f141367read_and_process.m - 1,210,706,682 bytesMD5:
3bd866a3857452c2a803a2c6fc4f7746Reconstructed positions pngs.zip - 5,738,248 bytesMD5:
e2ad7ce569de5cdb7b8f76e5bc637ec9Reconstruction pngs.zip - 55,484 bytesMD5:
1c220298a477b25cc28687d724bd68a1Reconstruction.xlsx - 29,719 bytesMD5:
38f07a3098ae363c5378d2b6ec42abbdReconstruction_correctness.xlsx - 309,416 bytesMD5:
3f732a6a9512109669955159d93e7e1dResults.zip - 788,937,978 bytesMD5:
0f03421eaad52f949bc3b2fe2290b11dUpdated script and fixation filter.zip -
download all files (zip)
4,188,230,679 bytes unzipped





