Supplementary data for the paper: 'Detecting Midjourney-generated images: An eye-tracking study'
DOI: 10.4121/96b5eb59-b9a4-4094-8c47-04c14d57af1a
Datacite citation style
Dataset
Licence CC BY 4.0
Interoperability
This study investigated human performance in identifying AI-generated images. In a speeded forced-choice task, 255 participants viewed paired images (one real, one AI-generated by Midjourney) of standard or futuristic cars and buildings and had to identify the AI-generated one, while eye movements were recorded using an eye-tracker. Results revealed a powerful ‘futurism-as-artificiality’ heuristic. Specifically, participants performed poorly (55% correct) when an AI-generated standard image was paired with a real futuristic image Conversely, accuracy was high (91% correct) when the AI-generated futuristic image was paired with a real standard image. Participants' gaze landed first on the AI-generated image more often when it depicted a futuristic design than when it depicted a standard one. The demonstrated heuristic presents a double-edged sword for information veracity: it may lead to the uncritical acceptance of AI-generated misinformation that appears conventional, while simultaneously causing real forward-thinking designs to be dismissed as fake.
History
- 2025-07-14 first online, published, posted
Publisher
4TU.ResearchDataFormat
readme/txt; scripts/m; data/mat; data/xlsx; images/png; video/mp4; supplementary methods/.pdf; experiment_paradigm/SR Research Experiment Builder filesOrganizations
TU Delft, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Department of Cognitive RoboticsDATA
Files (3)
- 10,843 bytesMD5:
35392f2b155ba6aec69d32f25490102c
readme.txt - 1,161,253,090 bytesMD5:
a2f241cd7411204460deee94746ec772
Code_and_Data.zip - 1,630,361,122 bytesMD5:
0bcdf05f83dbc92698168832f3711e39
Experiment_Material.zip -
download all files (zip)
2,791,625,055 bytes unzipped