Supplementary data for the paper: Replicating five pupillometry studies of Eckhard Hess
doi: 10.4121/14134874
Several papers by Eckhard Hess from the 1960s and 1970s report that the pupils dilate or constrict according to the interest value, arousing content, or mental demands of visual stimuli. However, Hess mostly used small sample sizes and undocumented luminance control. In a first experiment (N = 182) and a second preregistered experiment (N = 147), we replicated five studies of Hess using modern equipment. Our experiments (1) did not support the hypothesis of gender differences in pupil diameter change with respect to baseline (PC) when viewing stimuli of different interest value, (2) showed that solving more difficult multiplications yields a larger PC in the seconds before providing an answer and a larger maximum PC, but a smaller PC at a fixed time after the onset of the multiplication, (3) did not support the hypothesis that participants’ PC mimics the pupil diameter in a pair of schematic eyes but not in single-eyed or three-eyed stimuli, (4) did not support the hypothesis of gender differences in PC when watching a video of a male trying to escape a mob, and (5) supported the hypothesis that arousing words yield a higher PC than non-arousing words. Although we did not observe consistent gender differences in PC, supplementary analyses showed gender differences in eye movements towards erogenous zones. Furthermore, PC strongly correlated with the luminance of the locations where participants looked. Overall, our replications confirm Hess’s findings that pupils dilate in response to mental demands and stimuli of an arousing nature. Hess’s hypotheses regarding pupil mimicry and gender differences in pupil dilation did not replicate.
- 2021-04-12 first online
- 2021-04-14 published, posted
- A replication study of ‘pupil size as related to interest value of visual stimuli’ (Hess & Polt, 1960) (grant code 401.16.083) [more info...] Dutch Research Council
DATA
- 9,922 bytesMD5:
5f07906086bb75449bc7d2c986ad9087
readme.txt - 2,045,478,483 bytesMD5:
c38c523d023502072cc5b3a1147f4bc4
(1) Experiment 1 – Data analysis and stimuli.zip - 253,097,975 bytesMD5:
5e122a83f45d58f382c1727f9525e2c9
(10) Experiment 2 – Experiment Builder.zip - 4,048,434,937 bytesMD5:
d7c47aeb0df17e227411fdcfec3513b1
(11) Appendix D – Slide change in the Bell and Howell 935 Slide-Master.zip - 103,965,567 bytesMD5:
519f43648476f4afc3acb5d2179dbf88
(12) Appendix E – Slide change effects on pupil diameter.zip - 134,768,190 bytesMD5:
9e79a8320e59bc3131b86cead10abedb
(13) Appendix N – Reproduction of the results in Hess and Polt (1960).zip - 48,440 bytesMD5:
c9f743b3fbe9fe0dc48acda7b3727109
(14) Appendix S – Cooperation Between Hess and Marplan.zip - 1,867,150,418 bytesMD5:
44311ea3cc791a7b58952b3c152389e0
(2) Experiment 1 – Demo.zip - 2,796,908,157 bytesMD5:
76c3e60461177952826860ec929deb7d
(3) Experiment 1 – Read raw data.zip - 2,093,538,833 bytesMD5:
115a4640fe9ea6b92d1c9e20b430e7d5
(4) Experiment 1 – EyeLink data.zip - 10,585,522 bytesMD5:
3228dc3e491c77778b682d7a9c3dae44
(5) Experiment 1 – Experiment Builder.zip - 1,692,254,937 bytesMD5:
f84a5dbc09ac7ed9ecf5d1f87654c7af
(6) Experiment 2 –Data analysis and stimuli.zip - 3,411,276,007 bytesMD5:
3fbdb8301211cef77fb15b3c99cf8a27
(7) Experiment 2 – Demo.zip - 3,593,364,174 bytesMD5:
8ddd6dc987c83585fec9bdf84d161e79
(8) Experiment 2 – Read raw data.zip - 3,013,387,983 bytesMD5:
5f3f35bb4ffd21565cf3c4b4f83ef196
(9) Experiment 2 – EyeLink data.zip -
download all files (zip)
25,064,269,545 bytes unzipped